OVERCOMING BARRIERS TO LANGUAGE LEARNING FOR NEWCOMERS THROUGH THE ECOLOGICAL APPROACH
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17770/eid2025.2.87Keywords:
cognitive and motivating factors, cological approach to language learning; students` engagement in language learning, perspective, pedagogical strategies, newcomersAbstract
Language learning is closely intertwined with human interaction and the identity shaping process. By nature, the ecological approach to language learning conceptualizes language not as an isolated system, but as an interactive and adaptive component of a greater system. This article examines the integration of the ecological paradigm into language education, focusing on the role of ecological, pedagogical, and individual factors that influence learners in the language environment. The focus of the article is on the linguistic adaptation of newcomers to new language and educational ecosystems, in the context of the Latvian school system after the geopolitical shifts of 2022 (the Russian invasion of Ukraine). The results of the theoretical and empirical analysis highlight the importance of localized, adaptive teaching methods that take the individual needs and previous experiences of learners into account to create the conditions for comfortable language integration. Going beyond rigid curricular approaches, the ecological perspective offers a basis for promoting sustainable and inclusive language education. The aim of this study is to explore how the ecological approach to language learning can be effectively applied to support the linguistic integration of newcomer students—particularly Ukrainian children—within the Latvian educational system.
References
Arndt‚ H. & Janney‚ R. W., (1983). The duck-rabbit phenomenon: Notes on the disambiguation of ambiguous utterances. Journal of Studies in language ecology, 94- 11.
Bronfenbrenner, U., (1979). The ecology of human development: Experiments by nature and design. Harvard University Press, 209–236. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4159/9780674028845-011
Calvet, L. J., (1999). Pour une écologie des langues du monde. Les Grands Dossiers des Sciences Humaines, 46(3), 28–28. Plon. https://doi.org/10.3917/gdsh.046.0028 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3917/gdsh.046.0028
Deci‚ E. & Flaste‚ R., (1995). Why we do what we do: The dynamics of personal autonomy. Penguin books (pp. 3-11). New York Journal: Putnam’s Sons. Retrieved from: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/232484008_Why_we_do_what_we_do_The_dynamics_of_personal_autonomy. Accessed in January 1995.
Eyredice, (2024). Education system in Latvia. Retrieved from: https://eurydice.eacea.ec.europa.eu/eurypedia/latvia/overview.
Fill, A., & Mühlhäusler, P., (Eds.). (2001). The ecolinguistics reader: Language, ecology and environment (pp. 57–84). Continuum. Retrieved from: https://linguisticstudentindonesia.wordpress.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/11/alwin-fill-peter-muhlhausler-the-ecolinguistics-reader_-language-ecology-and-environment-2001.pdf
Freeman, D., (2018). Looking ahead: Future directions in, and future research into, second language acquisition, Foreign Lang. Ann., vol. 51, no. 1. https://doi.org/10.1111/flan.12314. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/flan.12314
Gibson, J. J., (1979). The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A., vol. 12, No. 2, 107- 139. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
Haugen, E., (1972). The Ecology of Language. In Dill, A. S. (ed) The Ecology of Language: Essays by Einar Haugen, Stanford: Stanford University Press. Retrieved from: https://archive.org/details/isbn_0804708029/page/n7/mode/2up
Kramsch, C., (2002). Language Acquisition and Language Socialization: Ecological Perspectives, 140-164. London: Continuum. Retrieved from: https://www.veramenezes.com/Kramsch.pdf
Kultūras ministrija, (1991). Par Latvijas nacionālo un etniskogrupubrīvuattīstību un tiesībāmuzkultūrasautonomiju. Retrieved from: https://likumi.lv/ta/id/65772-par-latvijas-nacionalo-un-etnisko-grupu-brivu-attistibu-un-tiesibam-uz-kulturas-autonomiju.
Lantolf, J. P., & Thorne, S. L., (2006). Sociocultural Theory and the Genesis of Second Language Development. Applied Linguistics, Volume 28, Issue 3, 477-480. Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amm027. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amm027
Official Statistics Portal of Latvia, (2023). Population growth in 2022 due to immigration. Retrieved from: https://stat.gov.lv/en/statistics-themes/population/population/press-releases/12338-number-population-latvia-2022.
Rahardi, K. (2023). Naturalistic ecolinguistics learning model interframework of green ecology: Development urgencies. Jurnal Gramatika, 9(2), 217–238. https://doi.org/10.22202/jg.2023.v9i2.6728 DOI: https://doi.org/10.22202/jg.2023.v9i2.6728
Richards, J.C., (1996). Teachers’ maxims in language teaching. TESOL Quarterly, 30(4), (pp. 281–296). DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/3588144
Spolsky, B., (1989). Conditions for Second Language Learning. Studies in Second Language Acquisition. Introduction to a general theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
UN refugee agency, (2023). Ukraine situation – Global report 2023. United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees. Retrieved from: https://data.unhcr.org/en/situations/ukraine.
Van Lier, L., (1997). Observation from an ecological perspective. TESOL Quarterly 31(4), 783–787. Retrieved from: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.2307/3587762 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/3587762
Van Lier, L., (2004). The Ecology and Semiotics of Language Learning: A Sociocultural Perspective. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-7912-5_2 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-7912-5
Wijayanto, A., (2005). An ecolinguistic perspective on the languages used by a Javanese in Banjarmasin, South Kalimantan: A case study. Kajian Linguistik dan Sastra, 15(29), 80–91.
Williams, M., & Burden, R. L., (1997). Psychology for language teachers: A social constructivist approach. Cambridge University Press. Retrieved from: https://assets.cambridge.org/97805214/98807/frontmatter/9780521498807_frontmatter.pdf
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Yuliia Vasylieva, Maija Ročāne, Santa Meļķe
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
How to Cite
